What is Eminent Domain? Example Cases and Laws Surrounding it

Back To Investment Terms

Key Takeaways:

  • Eminent domain is a legal concept that grants the government the power to seize private property for public use.
  • One of the most famous examples of eminent domain in action is the case of Kelo v. City of New London, which was decided by the Supreme Court in 2005.

Eminent Domain Definition and Examples

Eminent domain is a legal concept that grants the government the power to seize private property for public use, provided that the property owner receives just compensation. This power is derived from the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which states that private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation. The rationale behind eminent domain is that the needs of the public sometimes outweigh the rights of private property owners.

One of the most famous examples of eminent domain in action is the case of Kelo v. City of New London, which was decided by the Supreme Court in 2005. In this case, the city of New London, Connecticut, sought to seize several properties in order to redevelop the area and boost economic growth. The property owners, led by Susette Kelo, argued that the city’s use of eminent domain was unconstitutional because the properties were not being taken for public use, but rather for private development. However, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the city, stating that economic development qualified as a public use under the Fifth Amendment.

Another notable example of eminent domain is the case of Berman v. Parker, which was decided by the Supreme Court in 1954. In this case, the city of Washington, D.C., sought to seize several properties in a blighted area in order to redevelop the neighborhood. The property owners argued that the city’s use of eminent domain was unconstitutional because the properties were not being taken for a traditional public use, such as a highway or a park. However, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the city, stating that the redevelopment of blighted areas was a valid public use under the Fifth Amendment.

Eminent Domain for Private Use

In recent years, there have been several controversial cases of eminent domain, particularly those involving the seizure of private property for the benefit of private companies. For example, in the case of Poletown Neighborhood Council v. City of Detroit, the city of Detroit seized several properties in order to make way for a General Motors factory. The property owners argued that the city’s use of eminent domain was unconstitutional because the properties were being taken for the benefit of a private company, rather than for public use. However, the Michigan Supreme Court ruled in favor of the city, stating that the economic benefits of the factory qualified as a public use.

Despite these controversial cases, eminent domain remains an important tool for governments to use in order to promote the public good. For example, eminent domain has been used to build highways, schools, and other public infrastructure projects that benefit society as a whole. However, the use of eminent domain must always be balanced against the rights of private property owners, and governments must ensure that property owners receive just compensation for their losses.

While there have been several controversial cases of eminent domain in recent years, particularly those involving the seizure of private property for the benefit of private companies, eminent domain remains an important tool for governments to use in order to promote the public good. As with any legal concept, the use of eminent domain must be carefully balanced against the rights of private property owners, and governments must ensure that the public benefits of any seizure outweigh the costs to individual property owners.